Within the framework of a settlement between all the parties, the Autorité de la concurrence fines Henkel and its wholesaler-importers in several overseas departments €600,000.
The Autorité de la concurrence presently issues a decision by which it globally fines Henkel and several importers of its products in La Réunion, the Antilles, Guiana and the Wallis-and-Futuna Islands approximately 615 000 euros for implementing exclusive import contracts between March 2013 and February 2016, breaching Article L. 420-2-1 of the French Commercial Code pursuant to the law of 20 November 2012 relative to economic regulation overseas, known as the « Lurel Law ».
Concerned sector is the overseas distribution of consumer goods1, such as fresh or not feed products, beverages, household and personal care products, and cosmetics sold under manufacturer brand.
This decision is the first by which the Autorité publicly releases a general settlement with all the companies involved in a same case, given that none of them made a statement of objection.
The fine is divided as follows: €250,000 for Henkel, €210,000 for importers of Henkel products in La Réunion, €140,000 for importers of Henkel products in the Antilles and Guiana, and €15,000 for the importer of Henkel products in the Wallis-and-Futuna Islands.
In 2015, the Autorité had obtain commitments from several industrial players
In its decision 15-D-14 of 10 September 2015 (see press release of 10 September 2015), the Autorité de la concurrence had implemented the provision of the Lurel Law which prohibited exclusive imports. It then accepted that companies Pernod-Ricard, Danone, Johnson&Johnson and Bolton Solitaire submit commitments, leading to the termination of the proceedings. The very early proposal from these companies to organize a call for applications in order to select non-exclusive importers overseas had enabled the commitments procedure to be implemented without fines.
First settlement decision
In the case of contracts between Henkel and its wholesalers, the extension of exclusive import contracts beyond the date set by the law, namely 22 March 2013, led the Autorité to hand down fines. This first decision is a signal sent to all overseas wholesalers or companies selling products in these territories which henceforth must avoid going back to exclusive import practices of any kind, which frow now on will be severely repressed.
In this case, companies involved have not issued a statement of objection and have been able to benefit from the new settlement procedure introduced in 2015 by the Law of 6 August 2015 for Growth, Activity and Equality of Economic Opportunities, known as the « Macron Law ». Present decision therefore establishes a precedent.
Procedural advantages allowed by the settlement are illustrated by the brevity of the decision, which takes notice of the compromise elaborated with each company without giving details of the negotiations that led to an agreement. The respect of confidentiality on the modalities and conditions of the settlement is a guarantee for the companies which will engage in this procedure in the future.
1 Concerned brands are, among others : Mont Saint-Michel, Syoss, Schwarzkopf, Palette, Vademecum, Denivit, Teraxyl, Diadermine, Le Chat, SuperCroix, Xtra, Mir, Minidou, Bref, Decapfour, Terra, Loctite, Patex, Rubson Loctite, Rubson.
> See full text of decision 16-D-15 of 6 July 2016 on practices implemented in the distribution of consumer goods overseas.
> Press contact: Aurore GIOVANNINI / Tel.: + 33 1 55 04 01 81/ Email